Desert Archives - Page 7 of 9

June 12, 2014July 18, 2020

National Park or National Monument?

Established in 1916 the National Park Service manages all properties included in the National Park System. This system includes over 400 areas that encompass more than 84 million acres of land. These areas can go by one of 31 different titles. Within this system, Utah boasts 1 national historic site, 2 national recreation areas, 7 national monuments, and 5 national parks. While the reason for some of these titles is self-explanatory, the reason for others is less clear. National Park or National Monument?

For example, what makes one area a “national park” and another a “national monument?” Most people – including myself – would probably guess that the difference is in size. And while this is sometimes true, the primary difference is the reason for which each is established, because these two designations grew from historically separate concepts. The notion of the national park, which was simply the idea of large-scale natural preservation for public enjoyment, grew in popularity throughout the 1800s. As a result you can typically think of a national park as a spectacular scenic feature or natural phenomena preserved for inspirational, educational, and recreational value.

On the other hand, the idea of the national monument arose as a result of the need and desire to also protect prehistoric cliff dwellings, pueblo remains, and other historic ruins found by explorers of the American West and Southwest. Efforts to protect these sites resulted in the passing of the Antiquities Act of 1906. Therefore a national monument is usually designated to preserve objects of prehistoric, historic, cultural, and/or scientific interest. However, the Antiquities Act has been used more widely to preserve natural features as well, meaning the content of national monuments can be quite varied from wilderness areas to military sites to buildings and ruins.

There are also a couple of legal differences between these two designations. National parks are established through acts of Congress, whereas national monuments are established by Presidential proclamation. Administratively, the National Park Service manages all national parks. While national monuments, depending on their location and content, can fall under not only under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service, but also that of the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Defense, or the Bureau of Land Management.

So, it’s not just size that makes the difference, its intent, content, process of establishment, and administration. The next time you visit one of Utah’s national parks or monuments, will you be able to tell the difference?

For Wild About Utah, I’m Anna Bengtson of Park City.

Arches National Park
Bryce Canyon National Park
Capitol Reef National Park
Canyonlands National Park
Zion National Park

Golden Spike National Historic Site
Cedar Breaks National Monument
Dinosaur National Monument
Grand Staircase National Monument
Hovenweep National Monument
Natural Bridges National Monument
Pipe Spring National Monument(Border Utah/Arizona)
Rainbow Bridge National Monument
Timpanogos Cave National Monument

Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area

Credits:
Image: Courtesy and Copyright Anna Bengston
Text: Anna Bengston

Additional Reading:

Biggers, Ashley. “National Parks Versus National Monuments.” Outside Online. 22 Apr. 2014. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.outsideonline.com/adventure-travel/escapes/travel-agent/The-Difference-between-National-Parks-and-National-Monuments.html.

McDonnell, Janet. The national parks: shaping the system. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 2005. Web, 8 June 2014. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/shaping/index.htm.

O’Connor, Mary. “Killing A Bill that Could Save National Parks.” Outside Online. N.p., 14 Apr. 2014. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/the-current/footprint/Five-Treasures-We-Owe-to-the-Imperiled-Antiquities-Act.html.

“Parks and Monuments.” Utah. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.visitutah.com/parks-monuments/.

Righter, Robert. “National Monuments to National Parks:
The Use of the Antiquities Act of 1906”, National Park Service History: National Monuments to National Parks. N.p., Aug. 1989. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/hisnps/npshistory/righter.htm.

United States. National Park Service. “National Park Service History: National Park System Nomenclature.” National Parks Service. U.S. Department of the Interior, n.d. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.nps.gov/history/history/hisnps/NPSHistory/nomenclature.html.

United States. National Park Service. “Frequently Asked Questions.” National Parks Service. U.S. Department of the Interior, 28 May 2014. Web. 8 June 2014. https://www.nps.gov/faqs.htm.

Yard, Robert Sterling, and Isabelle F. Story. “Parks vs. Monuments.” The national parks portfolio. 6th ed. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1931. Web, 8 June 2014. https://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/portfolio/portfolio0b.htm.

December 5, 2013March 4, 2018

Defining the Great Basin

Willow Creek North of Wells, NV. Sagebrush at mid-distance. Route of the California Trail used by pioneers. — Willow Creek north of Wells, NV.
Sagebrush at mid-distance.
Route of the California Trail
used by pioneers.

Courtesy & Copyright
Jim Cane, Photographer

Lupines amid sagebrush
north of Wells, NV.
Ruby Mountains in background
Courtesy & Copyright
Jim Cane, Photographer

Map delineating the Great basin
Courtesy Wikimedia, KMusser, Artist
Ref: wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Basin

Lupines amid sagebrush north of Wells, NV. Ruby Mountains in background — Willow Creek north of Wells, NV.
Sagebrush at mid-distance.
Route of the California Trail
used by pioneers.

Courtesy & Copyright
Jim Cane, Photographer

Lupines amid sagebrush
north of Wells, NV.
Ruby Mountains in background
Courtesy & Copyright
Jim Cane, Photographer

Map delineating the Great basin
Courtesy Wikimedia, KMusser, Artist
Ref: wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Basin

The Great Basin is aptly named. Twice the size of Kansas, it stretches from the watersheds of the Columbia and Snake rivers south to that of the Colorado, and from the crests of the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades eastward to the Wasatch front. The Western explorer John Fremont coined its name in 1845. The rivers and streams of the region that Fremont had seen all ended in sinks, marshes or lakes. None flowed to the Pacific Ocean. He confirmed this on meeting Joseph Walker at Mountain Meadows in Utah. Walker had traveled more of the basin’s western margins, dispelling rumors of a river traversing the Sierra Nevada. Precipitation that falls in the Great Basin stays in the Great Basin; water leaves only as vapor. This is the hydrographic Great Basin.

How else to view the vast region between the Rockies and the Sierra Nevada? Geologists speak of the “Basin and Range Province”, so named for its valleys and the towering ranks of north-south mountain ranges that march across the landscapes of Nevada and edges of adjacent states. Unlike the upthrust Rockies and Sierra Nevada, Earth’s crust in the Great Basin appears to be spreading, to be pulling apart. The tilted escarpments of the Wasatch front are the easternmost evidence of this crustal deformation that has built the Basin and Range Province.

Botanists delimit the Great Basin by the hardy flora that clothes this rugged landscape. Great Basin plants tolerate freezing winters and parched summers, and in the valleys, soils of varying salinity. The so-called Sagebrush Ocean fills many of the basins, as do other shrubs, such as shadscale and greasewood. Upslope, these give way to juniper woodlands, often mixed with piñon pine. This floristic Great Basin reaches eastward to central Utah and the Wasatch front, beyond which trees and other plants of the Rockies make their appearance.

The boundaries of all three concepts for the Great Basin — hydrographic, geologic and floristic — largely coincide. Each recognizes the distinctive attributes of the Great Basin that set it apart from neighboring regions. The Great Basin is readily recognizable to the trained eye, whether looking at satellite images, river courses, or the native plant communities encountered on a simple walk.

Credits:
Images: Jim Cane
Map: Courtesy Wikimedia, KMusser, Artist, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Text: Jim Cane

Additional Reading

Frémont, John Charles. 1845. Report of the exploring expedition to the Rocky Mountains in the year 1842 and to Oregon and North California in the years 1843 – 44. Printed by order of the Senate of the United States , Gales & Seaton, 693 pages. –available as a Google eBook scanned from the original published book Grayson, Donald K. 1999. The desert’s past : a natural prehistory of the Great Basin. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 356 pages. –an exceptionally readable, thorough and authoritative overview of the Great Basin, with many maps, photographs and illustrations.https://books.google.com/books?id=W8ICAAAAMAAJ

Intermountain Regional Herbarium Network. searchable plant database representing multiple holdings of herbaria at universities in Utah and Nevada, with maps, images and more https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/projects/index.php?proj=10

McPhee, John. 1981. Basin and Range. Farrar, Straus, Giroux, New York. 215 pages. –the first of the author’s many engaging books about geology. https://www.amazon.com/Basin-Range-John-McPhee/dp/0374516901

July 11, 2013December 1, 2023

Lichens

Click for a larger view of Rosette Lichen, Courtesy and copyright 2013 Andrea Liberatore, Photographer — Boulder covered in a
variety of lichen species
Copyright 2013
Andrea Liberatore, Photographer
Rosette Lichen
*Physcia dubia*
Lives in both Antarctica
and the Mojave Desert
Copyright 2013
Andrea Liberatore, Photographer
Rim Lichen
*Lecanora muralis*
Has anti-cancer and
anti-microbial properties
Copyright 2013
Andrea Liberatore, Photographer
Garovagis Rim Lichen
*Leconara garovagii*
Used in perfume & sunscreen
Copyright 2013
Andrea Liberatore, Photographer

This spring I visited Red Butte Gardens in Salt Lake City for the first time. My favorite part was a small and very non-descript garden, tucked alongside a walkway and devoted to an organism that isn’t a plant at all, but instead a very under-appreciated genera of life – the lichen.

Lichens are those colorful crusts found growing on rocks and trees, and while sometimes plant-like in appearance, they are not plants. Lichens have no leaves, stems, roots, or vascular systems. Even more strange, lichens are not a single organism, but instead a partnership between two organisms: a fungus and an algae or cyanobacteria. Because the fungus is generally the dominant partner, lichens are classified as members of the Fungus kingdom.

The partnership exhibited by these two organisms is an example of mutualism – a relationship where both parties benefit in some way through their interaction. In this case, the fungus provides a safe and secure home for the alga or cyanobacteria, which in return photosynthesizes and provides the fungus with nutrients. Cyanobacteria and algae are typically found in water and are prone to drying when exposed to sun and wind. The fungal partner provides shade and protection from desiccation by sheltering the algae within its body. As a result, lichens are incredibly drought-resistant and can be found in a wide variety of habitats including some of the most extreme environments Earth has to offer. In fact the Rosette Lichen or Physica dubia grows in both Antarctica and the Mojave Desert!

Lichens are not just interesting from a biological perspective, but also a chemical one. Lots of lichens create and exude a suite of chemicals, the roles of which aren’t entirely known. Some are thought make the lichen distasteful to predators, while others may help block harmful UV rays and increase membrane permeability to facilitate the movement of nutrients, water, and cellular byproducts between algae and fungi.

These chemicals have also attracted the attention of scientists, as some exhibit antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-tumor, and insecticidal properties. Many are being analyzed and tested for a variety of medicinal and household uses and may soon become a key ingredient in a physician’s arsenal. Already, these organisms are utilized by humans in a number of different ways, and have been for hundreds of years.

In some native cultures around the globe, lichens are a part of the traditional diet for both people and livestock. However, most lichens have little nutritional value, are bitter tasting, and some can be toxic. Lichen extracts are also used as natural dyes for wool and cloth with colors ranging from browns and purples, to yellows and oranges. Other uses include the manufacture of perfume, cosmetics and sunscreen, a substitute for hops in brewing beer, and as a key ingredient in litmus paper.

Lichens are also sensitive to air pollution, and for that reason don’t typically grow too close to human habitation. In fact, lichens absorb pollutants into their tissues and for that reason can play an important role as an indicator species for pollution problems. As air pollution becomes more widespread, lichen species could be in danger of being lost. And because we have only scratched the surface of what these amazing organisms can do, who knows what future medicine could be lost along with it.

I could go on, as I have only scratched the surface of what these organisms can do. And in the coming years, I think we’ll hear of even more lichen-based breakthroughs in science and medicine. The next time you pass a colorful, lichen-covered rock, take a closer look at these incredible organisms and pause for a moment to wonder about the mysteries, and possible answers, that lie within.

For the Stokes Nature Center and Wild About Utah, this is Andrea Liberatore.

Credits:

Additional Reading:

Ivins, Robert Fogel (1998) Lichens are Fungi! Utah State University Herbarium. Available online at: https://herbarium.usu.edu/fungi/funfacts/lichens.htm

Center for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science. Lichen Chemistry. Sahyadri E-news. Issue 34. Formerly available online at: https://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue34/lichens_chemistry/lichen_chemistry.pdf See https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257213745_Sahyadri_Shilapushpa_Lichen_Chemistry [Link updated Dec 1, 2023]

US Forest Service (2013) Celebrating Wildflowers: Lichens. Available online at: https://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/interesting/lichens/

April 25, 2013June 27, 2016

Cryptobiotic Soil Crusts

Click to view larger image of Cryptobiotic Soil Crust, Photo Courtesy and Copyright Mark Larese-Casanova — Cryptobiotic Soil Crust
Photo Courtesy & Copyright 2009
Mark Larese-Casanova

Hi, this is Mark Larese-Casanova from the Utah Master Naturalist Program at Utah State University Extension.

Looking out over a Utah desert, we might see relatively few plants- perhaps some sagebrush, maybe a few junipers or Joshua trees, or even some small wildflowers or cacti. What is less noticeable, though, is the living soil crust that holds this entire landscape together. It’s not just sand, but rather an important and vast partnership between bacteria, lichens, algae, and fungi. These soil crusts are often referred to as ‘cryptobiotic’, which means ‘living in suspended animation’. This is a fitting description, considering that water can be so rare in Utah’s deserts.

Cyanobacteria, which is often called blue-green algae, is the backbone of cryptobiotic soil crust. Vast networks of long, microscopic filaments of cyanobacteria and fungi grow in length when they are wet, and leave behind a casing that literally binds the soil together. So, what might otherwise be loose sand not only is less likely to be washed away by water or blown away by wind, but also is able to hold much more water for plants.

Cyanobacteria is also extremely useful to desert landscapes for its ability to take Nitrogen out of the air and make it available to plant roots in the soil. Desert soils typically have relatively low nutrients, so this is especially important to desert plants.

In many Utah deserts, cryptobiotic soil crusts can cover up to 70% of the ground surface. Old soil crust can often look like small mountain ranges with black or white peaks inhabited by lichens or mosses. The little valleys in between the tiny mountains of crust are perfect spots for the seeds of desert plants to grow. Over time, the above ground crust can grow up to ten centimeters, or four inches, thick!

However, cryptobiotic soil crust grows at an alarmingly slow rate of about one millimeter per year. So, any soil crust that is disturbed can take a very long time to recover. Depending on the amount of moisture a desert receives, it can take anywhere between 20 and 250 years for soil crust to grow back.

Next time you’re out in the desert, kneel down and have a close look at the telltale peaks and valleys of cryptobiotic soil crust. If you bring a magnifying glass, you just might be able to see some of the lichens and mosses. Be sure to stay on trail, though, and whatever you do, don’t bust that crust!

For Wild About Utah, I’m Mark Larese-Casanova.

Credits:

Images: Courtesy and copyright Mark Larese-Casanova
Text: Mark Larese-Casanova, Utah Master Naturalist Program at Utah State University Extension.
Additional Reading:

US Department of Interior. 2001. Biological Soil Crusts: Ecology and Management. Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1730-2., https://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/pdf/CrustManual.pdf
Rosentreter, R., M. Bowker, and J. Belnap. 2007. A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands. U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, Colorado., https://www.soilcrust.org/